Ahh, nothing like a little unbiblical guilt to finish the article. I do not know how many times Charisma has tried to sell the notion that we will "answer for our votes." I remember Jack Hibbs recently devoting an entire article to this wildly unscriptural argument. Can you imagine? You spend decades serving the Lord. Believing in His finished work on the cross. Believing in the blood. Serving in your local church. Sharing the gospel. Living your life so all can see as the light of the world. Raising godly children and grandchildren. Then you get to stand before Jesus Christ and He says, "hey, I would like to let you in, but Clinton in 96? What were you thinking?" This is such an absurdly stupid argument I am amazed when idiots in the NAR like Allen and Hibbs even try to make it. As if salvation is no longer about saving faith. As if carnal politics matter to Jesus. Spoiler alert - they do not! Not to mention that if we truly allow our conscience to dictate our choice then we should conclude we cannot vote for the guy who cheated on his first wife with his second wife and his third wife with a porn star. Sorry Ron. Bottom line here, three days before the election, the NAR and Charisma are getting very desperate so they wanted to create the illusion that Trump was saved back in 2016 and that means you should disbelieve your lying eyes and ears since. Oh, and if you needed a patina of Christianese, just think about the Apostle Paul when thinking about Trump. How ridiculous.
Reverend Anthony Wade - November 3, 2024
